The
first Monday of a new month is a day of possibilities, a day on which
all kinds of streaks can start, a day on which… one wants to wind
back the clock and have another couple days of weekend.
Monday
practices vary by scholar, but one that I’ve found helpful is
reviewing the writing-task spreadsheet. I keep a meta-list of all the
project ideas I’ve got, and their possible (or actual) venues, and
the status of the work involved. It’s
not a “to-do” list, more like a “to-consider” list.
I
treat this project-mapping like brainstorming. There are no bad
writing projects; there are just projects that get assigned
priority 1200.
That
means I don’t automatically delete the oddities. Some sit at
priority 1200 forever, and that’s fine. Others linger on the
distant horizon for a year or four and unexpectedly acquire legs.
Keeping those possibilities visible contributes to a kind of
abundance mentality:
the weird idea that pops out as an aside in a class lecture can
remain available long enough to become an actual publication.
“Signposting
Shakespeare” worked like that: from class observation to “huh, I think that has
legs,” to collaborating with students on data collection and
bibliography gathering, to writing to submission to publication. The
first step in the process is to track the idea to begin with.
Which
is why at
the moment I have 107 items floating in the “I could consider this”
array. Nine
of those are
in one of the “pending” categories (either waiting on proofs or
waiting on publication), three
are active, and one is in the “start gathering bibliography”
stage.
Unlike
my 30-day reading spreadsheets, I don’t actually put down everything I’m writing on my
project-tracking spreadsheet. The point of THIS kind of tracking
isn’t really to be able to show everything I’ve done – the
gigantic CV is where that kind of thing goes. This is
tracking-for-planning.
Today’s post, for instance, is just the “hey, I need to warm up
and get motivated” kind of writing that drops in and makes thinking
through another task kind of fun. It never got entered.
But
I did look over what last-month-me thought I should be doing. The
spreadsheet helps
me turn
the vague sense that I have seventeen things I ought to be doing into
something more concrete,
and so more useful:
this needs reading, this needs an email, this one
is going to take a significant dive into my archival notes,
that
one can
wait.
Plus
the spreadsheet is a real blessing in terms of balancing what
needs a fresh morning brain and which projects can be assigned to the
afternoon me (who is less clever but often more dogged – a good
bibliography ferret, but not so much a creative thinker). Putting
words on page: morning task. Sending a follow-up email to the editor:
afternoon work.
PRACTICAL
DETAILS
Since
this spreadsheet is for tracking purposes, I have fourteen headers
that have been useful for my purposes:
Timeframe
|
Priority
|
PROJECT
|
Venue / scope
|
Data collection
|
Bibl
|
Data analysis
|
Writing
|
Submission
|
Awaiting
|
Nudge date
|
Revision
|
Publish
|
Thank-Yous
|
|
Obviously,
project
and venue
+ scope
are the most important for purposes of
project definition – remembering what it is exactly that I thought
this project might become.
I find it helpful to enter timeframes
for some projects, but mostly that’s just a “panic here” date –
an upcoming request for proposals gets a visual signal of “pending
deadline,” but a blog post is never going to get a date due. And
one doesn’t bother with deadlines for that Revise and resubmit; by
its very nature, it just joined this week’s (or next week’s) work
stack. Priority
is
a sorting tool for me, not a strict order-of-operations column. To
that end, I reuse a lot of numbers: 1 is this week, and there might
be three to five projects that are active. 2 is “keep this in mind”
– needing to prep my travel-reading meant that an article which I
wasn’t “working on” was sitting in the visible spot for the
last three months as my brain-dead filler task; I compiled the full
bibliography during late afternoons *before* it became an active
project. 9 is a “this has been submitted and needs tracking until
its fate is known” category. 1200 is a “probably don’t ever do
this” and 1300 is blog posts. The idea of priority numbering is to
bunch things into buckets of how much the project needs my attention.
Then
there’s the active work: data
collection
and bibliography-building
are two often parallel tasks; they might become yellow and then green
simultaneously, or I might do one or the other in completely
different months. Likewise, analysis
and writing
might be intertwined or separate; I just need to be tracking where I
am.
Submission
is enough of an act of self-flagellation that it gets its own
dopamine reward. After all, the things you’re fighting with are
fierce. Two-factor authentication across firewall barriers. Footnote
formatting by all the weird templates that people use. Writing the
abstract or defining the keywords. Deciding whether a cover letter is
needed or going with the simple submission. All of this is so
involved that I long ago decided that it deserved its visibility in
my work-flow.
And
then there’s the long afterwards. Awaiting and nudge date sit in
the same zone of limbo: not accepted, not rejected, just hanging out
in that “under consideration” land. I used to just use “Awaiting”
and then “Revision,” but some projects require more interaction
and the nudge date lets me actively decide how long I want to wait
before putting in a reminder and then (and this is critical) to not
do anything about it until that date. I’m in the humanities: the
goal is for weeks not to become months and months not to become
years.
Revisions
are where the R&R and copy-edits go, and Publish
where proofs live respectively. (An outright rejection gets recorded
on the “completed projects” tab – it’s the less happy kind of
completion, but it does draw the project to a close. Then I get to
decide, and the project either goes back to establish a different
possible venue and consider rewriting or gets pushed off the list
altogether. In either case, feedback is a gift.)
The
last category is also important: when a project reaches its final
stage, I like to contact people whose ideas helped me frame my own
thoughts and thank them, and to write to archives that supported my
research to show what came of it all. So Thank-Yous
are part of tidying up at the end of project, a sort of tack-and-tie
to my scholarly peers.
And
then the spreadsheet is ready for another Monday. Most of those 107
ideas will not become this month’s work, and some of them may never
become anything at all. That’s fine. The point isn’t to turn
every possible project into a writing
obligation.
It’s to cultivate
a kind of abundance
mentality: to
keep
enough of the possibilities visible that, when Monday
asks me what I should
write next, I’m not staring
at
an empty page.
OTHER
PRODUCTIVITY POSTS
The
Whiteboard Where Big Things Live
— another approach to getting the sprawling mass of things-to-do
out of your head and into a form where priorities become visible.
How To Jump-Start a Scholarly Article: The Plan — for what happens when one of those
distant-horizon ideas finally acquires legs and needs to become an
actual article.
Managing Bibliography by Spreadsheet — my other spreadsheet habit: a 30-day system
for turning a prospective bibliography into a reading plan and making
progress visible.
Writing is Momentum —
on why idea-generating, blogging, listing, and generally keeping in
contact with your own thinking all count as part of the writing
process.