| Example of a drop cap "H" for "Herr" (spelled "Her" by this scribe):Her du
hast gesegnet den ertrich, du hast hin gekert die gefencknus Jacobs (Ps 84/85: Benedixisti
Domine terram tuam, avertisti captivitatem Jacob.) From Prime, Bregenz VLB, fol
50v.
|
Two lines. Three lines.
Occasionally six.
If you’ve never spent
time staring at an early modern prayerbook, this may sound like the sort of
scholarly detail that proves that historians have too much time on their hands.
But sometimes those
tiny details tell us something important.
Recently I went through
the Office of the Virgin in a sixteenth-century German prayerbook from the Lake
Constance region and tagged every decorated initial. Not just whether there was an initial, but how large it was: two
lines, three lines, sometimes a larger marginal initial. I also recorded the
genre of the text that followed – psalm, antiphon, collect, hymn, and so on.
In other words: I
counted them.
Every. Single. One.
The result is the sort
of table that delights the inner nerd.
|
|
Total
|
Total Larger Caps
|
3-line (or more)
|
2-line
|
Includes Latin incipit
|
|
TOTALS
|
117
|
92
|
29
|
63
|
41
|
|
Psalm
|
37
|
34
|
17
|
17
|
28
|
|
Antiphon
|
26
|
20
|
3
|
17
|
5
|
|
Collect
|
14
|
14
|
3
|
11
|
4
|
|
Chapters / lessons
|
10
|
8
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
|
Ymnus
|
7
|
6
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
|
Other
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Responsories
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
|
Versicle
|
17
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Table 1. Raw counts of decorated initials by genre in
the Office of the Virgin from Bregenz VLB Hs 17, copied by Scribe 2. Before
interpretation, the numbers simply show how often each type of text is
introduced with enhanced initials.
At this stage the numbers are just numbers. We’ve
known for years that manuscripts use two-line and three-line initials as a kind
of visual hierarchy (Hughes MMMO). Two-line initials mark many items—antiphons,
collects, and psalms. But the three-line initials cluster strongly around
psalms, and around the structural openings of the Hours.
To make the pattern easier to see, I reorganized
the data and highlighted three clusters:
·
Yellow:
Psalms
·
Orange:
Musical genres (antiphons, hymns, responsories)
·
Blue:
Collects
|
|
Total
|
Total Larger Caps
|
% 3-line
|
% 2-line
|
Latin incipit
|
|
TOTALS
|
117
|
92
|
25%
|
54%
|
41
|
|
Psalm
|
37
|
34
|
46%
|
46%
|
28
|
|
Antiphon
|
26
|
20
|
12%
|
65%
|
5
|
|
Collect
|
14
|
14
|
21%
|
79%
|
4
|
|
Chapters / lessons
|
10
|
8
|
30%
|
50%
|
1
|
|
Ymnus
|
7
|
6
|
14%
|
71%
|
1
|
|
Other
|
5
|
5
|
40%
|
60%
|
1
|
|
Responsories
|
3
|
3
|
0%
|
100%
|
1
|
|
Versicle
|
17
|
2
|
0%
|
12%
|
0
|
Table 2. Percentages of each genre marked by enhanced
initials. Converting the raw counts into proportions reveals the manuscript’s
visual hierarchy: psalms (yellow) receive enhanced initials most frequently,
while musical texts (orange) and collects (blue) are marked but less often
emphasized.
Once the colors are added, the structure of the
Office jumps out immediately.
The psalms dominate the enhanced initials.
They receive the largest and most frequent decorative emphasis. Visually, they
anchor the page.
The musical genres, by contrast – antiphons
and hymns – are consistently marked but rarely elevated to the highest level of
prominence. They are clearly signposted, but not treated as the structural
core.
The collects occupy an interesting middle
position. They are marked reliably and occasionally emphasized, suggesting that
the scribe saw them as moments of liturgical articulation – points where the flow
of psalmody gathers into a focused prayer.
Put together, the
manuscript’s visual system reflects a three-part hierarchy of the Office:
·
Psalms
as the structural backbone
·
Musical
texts as framing elements
·
Collects
as moments of devotional focus
This is interesting,
and maybe even a bit disconcerting, because if you ask a modern musicologist
what matters most in the Office, the answer is often the antiphons. Those are the musically
distinctive parts. They carry the chant melodies that change from feast to
feast. They are where the repertoire becomes specific.
But this prayerbook
suggests that the Thalbach sisters who used it experienced the Office somewhat
differently.
For them, the
antiphons were important – but the psalms
were the real center of gravity. Psalms structured the Hours. They
carried the devotional weight. They were the texts that deserved the most
visual attention on the page. And, of course, they were the first texts that
novices would have learned – the most familiar part of the Latin liturgy. The
heavy presence of Latin incipits for the psalms – and the relative paucity of
those labels for other genres – reinforces their importance to the Sisters
whose book this was.
In other words, the
page layout quietly encodes that understanding of the centrality of psalmody.
The decorative hierarchy mirrors the liturgical one, our musical longing
notwithstanding.
Which is why counting the lines in drop caps – two lines,
three lines, occasionally six—turns out not to be ridiculous after all.
WORKS CITED Bregenz, VLB Hs 17, a Thalbach Sister's Prayerbook from the 16th century
Hughes, Andrew. Medieval Manuscripts for Mass
and Office: A Guide to their Organization and Terminology. Toronto :
University of Toronto Press, 1995/r2017.
|