 |
| Two men in hats on a rubble heap, one playing a wall-attached string instrument |
And yet, I want to make a plea to you, dear reader, that you take the 21 minutes to watch this amazing film about a leper colony, a film created in 1962, the year before I was born. Feminist Iranian poet Forough Farrokhzad made only this one film, but her documentary about ugliness and beauty and grace and humanity – and isolation – and disfiguring disease is truly transcendent.
Her film is a profound meditation on the resilience of humanity and the power of community in the face of disfiguring disease and social exclusion. Through stark and compelling visuals, poetic reflections, and moments of shared joy—a few of which are marked by music—the film challenges viewers to confront our own perceptions of beauty, grace, and shared humanity. The message of the film is that we humans are not limited to our disease-prone body; perhaps the most important things to all of us everywhere are the moments of joy, the beloved doll, and the connectedness one to another.
“On this screen will appear an image of ugliness, a vision of pain that no caring human being should ignore,” she warns us at the beginning of the film. Disfigured bodies, and the care that they need, are dealt with unflinchingly. Well, that’s not true. Farrokhzad may not have flinched from showing the care of a diseased foot, even returning to it, but I flinched. The hands, yes, pressing the hands to straighten them out makes sense. It’s even akin to the treatment that mom went through, though she had a different disease. But the dead flesh on the foot, yikes, that was hard to see. Why look? Because, as she says, we should care enough to know.
Superimposed over the glimpses of life in the leper colony, we get segments of Farrokhzad’s poetry. “Remember that my life is wind. I have become the pelican of the desert, the owl of the ruins, and like a sparrow I am sitting alone on the roof” (12:03). We watch members of the community at games, and Farrokhzad reminds us again that “Remember my life is wind, and you have given me a time of idleness, and around me the song of happiness...” (13:32). These poetic evocations help us to process what we’re seeing. They aren’t a narrative per se, but rather the evocation of meaning that goes in tandem with the visual element. More lyrical than prosodic, Farrokhzad reaches to us at a visceral level to command our engagement and provoke us into understanding of what we are seeing, and ultimately, it is to be hoped, into acceptance of the shared humanity of these scenes.
Music appears in a few segments of the film. It accompanies the scenes of play, work, grooming, and childcare (14:17-14:43). This is self-made music, internal to the community, not from outside, and not complex, but rather a simple thrumming of an instrument I don’t recognize. The community does, though: we see the dancing feet of a member of the community in time to the thrumming. “Let’s listen to the soul who sings in the remote desert,” says Farrokhzad, “The one who sighs and stretches his hands out saying: Alas, my wounds have numbed my spirit.” Numbed my spirit, perhaps, but not deadened it. There is still a capacity to dance, and to love.
We have a bit of singing at (15:09), but it is a momentary lead-in to visions of more personal grooming: a mother (one presumes) with her daughter, and a woman with deformed hands applying makeup to her eyes. These images are accompanied by an exhortation that vanity is in vain:
“O the time-forgotten one, dressing yourself in red, and wearing golden ornaments, anointing your eyes with kohl, remember you have made yourself beautiful in vain, for a song in the remote desert, and your friends who have denigrated you…”
The question of beauty is particularly fraught, of course, in the environment of a leprosarium.
The third musical example of the film is a bit of ceremony, with drum (15:52-17:10) interlaced with singing mixed with murmurs as the crowd moves in what seems to be procession. The procession segues directly into a chamber ensemble environment, with visual closeups of a strummed fretted string instrument (an Iranian Tar), a double reed, and a flute-like instrument, as well as the pervasive drum, shown toward the end of the section. This music is met with enthusiasm – the audience smiles, indulges in clapping along, and dances. The film seems to argue that music is integral to community, and I can get behind that sentiment! With music driving the gathering, we are led to see these people not as patients, but as engaged participants in an inclusive community.
We may know that this is a leper colony, but the film doesn’t make that point explicit until the gates close in on the inhabitants at 20:30. By that point, we have been so engaged with the life of these people that the closing gate – the separating out, the quarantine, the segregation – comes as a disturbing rejection of our shared humanity.
Which is probably exactly the message that Forough Farrokhzad meant to convey.
The House is Black (1962) by Farough Farrokhzad, available https://www.criterionchannel.com/the-house-is-black
Note: Nowadays leprosy is called Hansen’s disease to avoid the stigma associated with the terms “leper” and “leprosy.” I use the former term since it is the language used in the film’s translation. The disease is still relatively common; the CDC points out that 250,000 around the world are diagnosed with Hansen's disease each year. But it is also treatable, a point that Farrokhzad emphasized in her narrative.
